![]() Some of such elements are Uncertainty levels, innovations, customer relations, etc.īoth of the methodologies assist organizations in the completion of the projects. Moreover, there are other factors that need to be considered while selecting between the two methodologies. If the client expects the details of the project at certain stages, the agile methodology works better in such cases. The agile methodology should only be adopted in situations where teams work on a timely basis. ![]() If a team is clear about the idea of a product and the client is also sure about the project’s scope, then in such a situation, waterfall methodology can be easily adopted. The project or the code won’t be given to the client initially but only when the project is completed. Waterfall methodology is ideal in a situation where there has been a clear understanding of the final products. Experts’ opinions if absent can create hurdles in the projects.Agile is not accepted for smaller projects.Though any change can be entertained in the middle of the project it can create problems for other organizations.A dedicated team is needed in this methodology and any absence of a team person can create issues in project execution.Since no schedule is available under this methodology, projects can be difficult to manage under tight schedules.Rewritings are promoted under this methodology so as to achieve desired results.Results can be examined easily at the end of each sprint.Since each process is segregated into sprints, bugs can be easily resolved after the completion of a single sprint.The involvement of customers at every stage is entertained.Customers can bring out any change even after the initial stage and such changes can be easily addressed.Some of the pros and cons of Agile methodology are as below: Under unclear requirements this methodology proves ineffective.Any change to be made at the previous stage cannot be done.Any change in the middle of the project is difficult to be addressed.Testing is done at the end of the project.Waterfall technology can’t be used for large size projects.Each phase assures an efficient review process.Teams can easily adapt to this procedure.Delivery of the projects is much faster.This develops a sense of trust among the clients. Every detail related to projects is clearly outlined.Waterfall methodology is more detailed and is considered ideal for project planning.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |